Astrology Report

I can’t say that I agree with Sarah Palin’s politics, or that I even like her, but for some reason I can’t stop reading about her. She is a fascinating character in a sea of male politician look-a-likes, especially being a Republican. So I became curious about her astrological make-up and when her stats became public I went on-line and dug out her chart.

Sarah Palin was born in Sandpoint, Idaho on February 11, 1964, at 4:40pm. This makes Palin an Aquarius sun sign, with Leo rising and moon in Aquarius, as well. Actually, Aquarius appears many times in her chart, in Mercury, Mars and Saturn. This woman is a force to be reckoned with.

For starters, having her sun sign in Aquarius makes her a born doer. She is ambitious, energetic, extroverted, assertive, with a strong ego. These qualities are heightened by the influence of Aquarius present in her moon, as well. Palin is group oriented, prefers to lead rather than follow, and does not want to be confined to domesticity.

Jupiter in Aries gives this woman the drive and focus necessary for being a leader, but having Aries in Venus makes her seem a bit brusque. Palin is not easily shaken by external factors thanks to the coolness bestowed by Aquarius in Mercury.

Having Mars and Saturn in Aquarius makes Sarah a reformist, but she needs to learn to be open-minded since her conservative views leave little room for compassion and flexibility.

And I think what makes Sarah Palin the celebrity that she has become is having Leo as her rising sign. Leo’s influence is what gives her popularity. Leos are naturally fascinating individuals who always steal the spotlight from those around her. It’s this influence that allows her to make connections with the public, otherwise Aquarius’ influence would dominate her personality and make her cool and distant.

Sarah Palin has the astrological make-up of a natural born leader, but a person is more than their chart. She has immersed herself in a conservative environment dominated by male power and given her chart she is apt to absorb those qualities.

There’s nothing wrong with that, I do think it’s curious that she embodies all the things that conservative men have criticized in professional women: independence, ambition, masculinity. She needs to analyze what the intentions of those around her are when she was nominated as running mate, and not let it get to her head.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 16th, 2008 at 11:35 am and is filed under Astrology, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.